|
The Addis Abeba City Administration has had a bad track record when it
comes to the administration and supervision
of land in the city. The taskforce
established by the city administration to
study land issues in the capital has
revealed problems, in detail, in a report of
the study it conducted during the past year.
Following the study, the city administration took various steps that it
thought would alleviate the problems. One of
the steps was to solve the title deed issues
that have festered over the years without
any concrete solutions. Although late, this
move, if seen through to the end, is
commendable.
However, following the announcement of its plan to solve title deed
issues, the recent move by the
administration, to reclaim one million
square metres of land belonging to 34 real
estate developers for failing to start their
projects on time, has come as a surprise to
many. A letter, written by the Land
Administration and Building Permits
Authority of the city to the district
offices of Bole, Yeka, Kolfe Keranio, and
Nefas Silk Lafto, ordered these plots to be
reclaimed, their deeds collected or
invalidated, and their land to be put into
the government’s land bank.
True, real estate developers have failed to perform as well as they
should have. This much was established in
the report by the taskforce, whose study of
seven districts has shown that only around
14pc have started construction on time and
are on track.
The case with these plots, some of which are owned by high profile
businessmen in the city, is a puzzling one.
Many of these real estate developers, who
signed lease agreements in 2005 and 2006 and
who are taken aback by the decision of the
city, cite many problems that largely have
to do with the city administration.
Even though they signed their lease agreements in 2005 and 2006, some
claim not to have received their land until
a couple of years ago, as relocation and
compensation of people who were already
living on the plots of land they were given
took some time.
Others complain about the lack of infrastructure, like road access and
electricity, which hindered them from
starting their projects.
Many of these developers wrote letters protesting the decision and
asking the administration to reconsider by
taking the situation of each developer
case-by-case. The administration will take
each request as it comes, it says.
No land will remain idle in the next year, the city is adamant about.
It plans to float these reclaimed plots back
for lease as well as take measures on the
rest. This is a laudable position, if it is
actually implemented.
No one would debate the need for the proper administration of land and
its usage in a timely manner, especially
when it comes to real estate development in
a city like Addis Abeba where housing is one
of the major problems.
While the notion behind the recent move by the city might be well
intentioned, the manner in which it was done
and the current situation with land and the
developers who have taken them begs the
question, “Why these 34?”
There are developers in the city, real estate or otherwise, who have
taken land from the city administration and
are just sitting idle with the properties
fenced off, it is no secret. How, therefore,
can these people claim that they either have
started construction or were delayed because
the city administration was unable to do its
part in ensuring that they got the land and
proper facilities?
Those who make the plans and those who report to the higher-ups are not
on the same page, it seems. Land related
issues cover an area where corruption and
influence often rear their ugly heads. It is
one of the areas where corruption is rife
and good governance lacking, the Prime
Minister admitted in his address to
stakeholders, three days ago.
Those who are on the ground, checking up on who has done what, may be
prejudiced in their reports on which
developers are actually doing work and which
are just dillydallying around, it seems.
Otherwise, how could the city administration be making an arbitrary
decision on only 34 developers and not the
rest? There are lots of plots just lying
barren, some with hardly a fence around
them, one can easily observe after venturing
out to the vast tracts allocated for
development on the outskirts of Addis Abeba.
This can also be seen in certain pockets of
the city.
The city administration has a track record of starting something en
mass and not seeing it through. A good
example is the huge land giveaway in 2005
and 2006, which was not followed through
with close supervision of the subsequent
situations and activities on the plots.
This seems to have happened again. The city administration, caught up
in the fever of the Growth and
Transformation Plan’s lofty goals, seems to
be on another path like the one five years
ago. A lack of consideration of all of the
aspects of the job seems to have occurred
again.
No one in their right mind would want to see a potential piece of
property just sitting idle, as the city
seems to agree with. However, a well-rounded
approach rather than spur-of-the-moment
action would do well in the long run.
The housing problem in the capital is a big one. At the current rate of
growth, at least 750,000 residences have to
be built every year to meet the growing
demand, according to industry experts.
Anyone who is serious about venturing into real estate development
would not take a plot and just sit idly,
given this reality. A close look at the
whole sector and its problems by the city
administration is needed. In fact, the city
administration should be following closely
the situations to solve any problems
developers have, so that they can complete
their projects.
In doing that, on top of solving the problems of the developers, the
administration would also be able to weed
out those who take land without doing
anything on it. Most importantly, a well
coordinated approach by every department of
the city administration is required.
So far, the city has shown its willingness to assess the situation of
those who have complained about the decision
to reclaim their plots, but this is not
enough. The administration needs to address
its policies and the criteria that it uses
to reclaim lands. Simply picking out a few
from the bunch does not mean that a job is
being done. If it has to be done, as well it
should, the administration has to take
measures on all developers who are not
developing their plots as they should, with
close scrutiny of each case and not en mass
and arbitrarily, as it has done.
Close scrutiny of its own departments and personnel is also very
important. As it is easy for developers to
manipulate those on the ground who are doing
the leg work to ensure who is legitimate and
who is not, a redundant process is also
required.
Most of all, the on and off attitude of the city administration,
especially when it comes to land
administration, needs to stop. All aspects
of the administration of land has to be
coordinated and well thought out, starting
from leasing, relocating, compensating, and
delivering the land to supervising its
development.
It is time that the administration learns from its past mistakes and
gets its act together. |